Willis v Charles [2016] NSWCATAP 164
Where a notice of termination relies on both end of fixed term and breach grounds, the tenant is entitled to select the ground most favourable, and is not liable for rent past the date they delivered vacant possession consistent with that ground. Appeal allowed in part regarding rent arrears; tenants not liable for rent beyond date of giving vacant possession.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- ['vacant Possession' 'rental Arrears' 'compensation for Fixtures' 'utility Charges']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether tenants were liable for rent after giving vacant possession under a notice relying on both fixed term expiry and breach grounds' 'Whether tenants were liable for costs of replacing toilet seat' 'Whether tenants were liable for solar electricity bill']
Ratio Decidendi
Where a notice of termination relies on both end of fixed term and breach grounds, the tenant is entitled to select the ground most favourable, and is not liable for rent past the date they delivered vacant possession consistent with that ground. Appeal allowed in part regarding rent arrears; tenants not liable for rent beyond date of giving vacant possession.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- ['Orders made at first instance on 29 March 2016 are set aside' 'Tenants Karenessa Willis and Peter Willis to pay landlord Robert S Charles $311.19' 'Rental Bond Services directed to pay landlord $311.19 from rental bond number P167107-9; any amount received to be credited against the above money order' 'Balance of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment