Tchoylak v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 872

Tchoylak v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 872

The appeal must be dismissed as moot because the applicant has been removed from Australia and has no realistic prospect of returning; there is no statutory or procedural basis for re-entry without a visa, and s 42(2A)(e)(ii) does not provide a remedy in the absence of an express order or undertaking; thus, any further determination would be futile.

Parties
Applicant: Karim Tchoylak; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Protection Visa, Refugees Convention Article 1 F, Crimes Against Humanity, Serious Non Political Crime, Mootness
Immigration Law Administrative Law Protection Visa Refugees Convention Article 1 F Crimes Against Humanity Serious Non Political Crime Mootness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karim Tchoylak

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether applicant excluded from refugee protection by Article 1F of the Convention
  2. 2 Whether applicant committed crimes against humanity or serious non-political crimes
  3. 3 Whether removal of applicant renders appeal moot

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal must be dismissed as moot because the applicant has been removed from Australia and has no realistic prospect of returning; there is no statutory or procedural basis for re-entry without a visa, and s 42(2A)(e)(ii) does not provide a remedy in the absence of an express order or undertaking; thus, any further determination would be futile.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Respondent to pay applicant's costs on an indemnity basis, taxed forthwith if not agreed, and paid directly to applicant's counsel