Safe Work (NSW) v Karimbla Constructions Services (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWDC 68

Safe Work (NSW) v Karimbla Constructions Services (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWDC 68

The offender is convicted and fined for breaching its health and safety duty by failing to comply with standards requiring an intermediate rail on stairs, exposing an employee to a risk of serious injury. Despite strong safety systems and mitigating actions, the breach was objectively serious and warranted a penalty reflecting both deterrence and the harm caused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction and fine imposed
Legal Topics
['duty of Care' 'employer Liability' 'risk Management' 'sentencing Principles' 'mitigating and Aggravating Factors' 'costs' 'australian Standards for Handrails and Stairways']
['criminal Law' 'work Health and Safety'] ['duty of Care' 'employer Liability' 'risk Management' 'sentencing Principles' 'mitigating and Aggravating Factors' 'costs' 'australian Standards for Handrails and Stairways']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Breach of health and safety duty under Work Health and Safety Act 2011' 'Failure to provide adequate edge protection on stairs' 'Employer responsibility for safety systems and hazard identification' 'Sentencing: assessment of objective seriousness and mitigating/aggravating factors']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender is convicted and fined for breaching its health and safety duty by failing to comply with standards requiring an intermediate rail on stairs, exposing an employee to a risk of serious injury. Despite strong safety systems and mitigating actions, the breach was objectively serious and warranted a penalty reflecting both deterrence and the harm caused.

Court Disposition

Conviction and fine imposed

Orders

  • ['The offender is convicted.' 'I impose a fine of $135,000.' 'Pursuant to section 122(2) Fines Act 1996, 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.' "The offender is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed in the sum of $27,000."]