THE REGISTRAR COURT OF APPEAL v PELECHOWSKI [1997] NSWCA 311
The respondent was present in court when a clear and unambiguous restraining order was pronounced. The respondent understood the terms and wilfully breached the order by executing a mortgage, constituting contempt of court.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Registrar Court of Appeal; Respondent: Karl Pelechowski; Respondent: Penelope Stephens
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Proceedings / Judgment on Contempt, Adjourned for Penalty
- Outcome
- Respondent found guilty of contempt; proceedings adjourned for penalty.
- Legal Topics
- Mareva Injunction, Breach of Court Order, Notice of Court Order, Jurisdiction of District Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Registrar Court of Appeal
Claimant
Karl Pelechowski
Respondent
Penelope Stephens
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Proceedings / Judgment on Contempt, Adjourned for Penalty
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Court had power to grant Mareva injunctions
- 2 Whether the injunction order was clear and unambiguous
- 3 Whether the respondent had proper notice of the injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent was present in court when a clear and unambiguous restraining order was pronounced. The respondent understood the terms and wilfully breached the order by executing a mortgage, constituting contempt of court.
Court Disposition
Respondent found guilty of contempt; proceedings adjourned for penalty.
Orders
- Declare that on 29 April and 9 July 1994 the respondent committed wilful breaches of the injunction granted by Judge Christie QC on 15 April 1994.
- Adjourn the proceedings to a date to be fixed to consider the question of penalty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment