Haim v NSW Trustee & Guardian; Estate of Feuerring [2013] NSWSC 1406
The defendant did not discharge the onus of proof that the deceased had testamentary capacity at the time of making the 2003 will. Evidence indicated the deceased suffered from persistent paranoid delusions and was unable to bring to mind or evaluate his sister's claim on his testamentary bounty; it is unlikely that Ben Marriot existed. The 2003 will was therefore invalid for want of testamentary capacity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceeding / Judgment
- Outcome
- Probate of the 2003 will refused; probate of the 1997 will granted
- Legal Topics
- ['testamentary Capacity' 'probate' 'wills' 'onus of Proof']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceeding / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the deceased had testamentary capacity at the time of making the 2003 will' 'Whether probate of the 2003 will should be granted' 'Onus of proof for testamentary capacity']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant did not discharge the onus of proof that the deceased had testamentary capacity at the time of making the 2003 will. Evidence indicated the deceased suffered from persistent paranoid delusions and was unable to bring to mind or evaluate his sister's claim on his testamentary bounty; it is unlikely that Ben Marriot existed. The 2003 will was therefore invalid for want of testamentary capacity.
Court Disposition
Probate of the 2003 will refused; probate of the 1997 will granted
Orders
- ["Probate of the deceased's will dated 16 September 1997 in solemn form be granted to the defendant." 'Cross-claim dismissed.' 'Costs of both parties to be paid out of the estate on the indemnity basis.' 'Proceedings remitted to the Registrar to complete the grant.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment