R v Abdallah [2020] NSWSC 1346
Given the complexity of the prior verdicts and findings, the constraints upon fact-finding inherent to a jury in this particular proceeding, and the interests of justice, the trial for manslaughter should be heard by judge alone pursuant to s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW).
- Parties
- Applicant: Katherine Abdallah; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling (application for Judge Alone Trial)
- Outcome
- Application for judge alone trial granted.
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Self Defence, Incontrovertibility of Prior Verdicts, Trial by Judge Alone, Application of Community Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Katherine Abdallah
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling (application for Judge Alone Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial for manslaughter should be heard by judge alone rather than by jury
- 2 Application of the legal principle of incontrovertibility of prior verdicts to the present trial
- 3 Appropriate directions about prior acquittals and self-defence in context of manslaughter charge
Ratio Decidendi
Given the complexity of the prior verdicts and findings, the constraints upon fact-finding inherent to a jury in this particular proceeding, and the interests of justice, the trial for manslaughter should be heard by judge alone pursuant to s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Application for judge alone trial granted.
Orders
- Katherine Abdallah, in relation to the charge of one count of manslaughter, be tried by judge alone.
- The trial will commence on Monday, 12 October 2020 and continue to conclusion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment