McDonald v Waverley Council [2024] NSWLEC 1604
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted as the parties reached agreement at conciliation, the proposal satisfies applicable planning controls, statutory requirements, and all relevant matters have been considered. The Court is satisfied that it can properly make the orders by consent.
- Parties
- Applicant: Katherine McDonald; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal (development Application) / Final Determination After Conciliation
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Alterations and Additions, Heritage, Floor Space Ratio, Height of Buildings, Conciliation Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Katherine McDonald
Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal (development Application) / Final Determination After Conciliation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development application DA-289/2023 should be granted for alterations and additions including a first-floor addition to a semi-detached dwelling
- 2 Whether the relevant statutory and planning requirements are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted as the parties reached agreement at conciliation, the proposal satisfies applicable planning controls, statutory requirements, and all relevant matters have been considered. The Court is satisfied that it can properly make the orders by consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development application DA-289/2023 for alterations and additions to a semi-detached dwelling including a first-floor addition at 25 Gipps Street, Bronte is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment