Wentworth v Rogers (No 1) [2016] NSWSC 283

Wentworth v Rogers (No 1) [2016] NSWSC 283

The plaintiff's motion was dismissed on the grounds that it sought yet again to impugn transactions and dealings already conclusively decided by a previous judgment (Howie J, 2003), which has withstood appellate challenge. The court determined that the principle of finality of litigation precludes the present application, and the matter cannot be revisited.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion (application for Account and Other Orders)
Outcome
Motion dismissed
Legal Topics
['finality of Litigation' 'applications for Accounts' 'joinder of Parties' 'costs']
['practice and Procedure'] ['finality of Litigation' 'applications for Accounts' 'joinder of Parties' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Motion (application for Account and Other Orders)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an account from the defendants regarding proceeds of the sale of jointly owned property' 'Whether Mrs Rogers should be joined as a party to the proceedings and compelled to provide documents' 'Whether the issues sought to be litigated have already been determined and cannot be revisited']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's motion was dismissed on the grounds that it sought yet again to impugn transactions and dealings already conclusively decided by a previous judgment (Howie J, 2003), which has withstood appellate challenge. The court determined that the principle of finality of litigation precludes the present application, and the matter cannot be revisited.

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed

Orders

  • ['The motion is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay Mrs Rogers' costs."]