Dalgleish v Dalgleish [1955] HCA 49

Dalgleish v Dalgleish [1955] HCA 49

The High Court held that the trial judge’s finding that the respondent was not an habitual drunkard was justified, as the evidence established heavy drinking but did not demonstrate the requisite condition of habitual drunkenness within the meaning of the Act. The order dismissing the petition for dissolution of marriage was affirmed.

Parties
Appellant: Kathleen Elizabeth Dalgleish; Respondent: Walter George Dalgleish
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Causes, Dissolution of Marriage, Habitual Drunkenness, Cruelty
Family Law Matrimonial Causes Dissolution of Marriage Habitual Drunkenness Cruelty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kathleen Elizabeth Dalgleish

Appellant

Walter George Dalgleish

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was an habitual drunkard as defined under s. 75(b) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.)
  2. 2 Whether the respondent had been habitually guilty of cruelty toward the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that the trial judge’s finding that the respondent was not an habitual drunkard was justified, as the evidence established heavy drinking but did not demonstrate the requisite condition of habitual drunkenness within the meaning of the Act. The order dismissing the petition for dissolution of marriage was affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed