Kathleen Reddacliffe v Paul Strickland [2010] NSWSC 1028

Kathleen Reddacliffe v Paul Strickland [2010] NSWSC 1028

No evidence was adduced of any contributions to the acquisition or conservation of the property; the claimed caveatable interest is only a claim to exercise a right of action; such a claim does not constitute a caveatable interest, and the caveat cannot be extended.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Summons to Extend Caveat
Outcome
Summons dismissed, caveat not extended.
Legal Topics
['caveats Against Dealings' 'torrens Title' 'equitable Interests' 'property Settlement After Relationship' 'extension of Caveat']
['real Property' 'family Law'] ['caveats Against Dealings' 'torrens Title' 'equitable Interests' 'property Settlement After Relationship' 'extension of Caveat']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Summons to Extend Caveat

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant has a caveatable interest in the property sufficient to warrant extension of the caveat' 'Whether a claimed right to future proceedings constitutes a caveatable interest']

Ratio Decidendi

No evidence was adduced of any contributions to the acquisition or conservation of the property; the claimed caveatable interest is only a claim to exercise a right of action; such a claim does not constitute a caveatable interest, and the caveat cannot be extended.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed, caveat not extended.

Orders

  • ['Decline to extend the caveat' 'Summons dismissed']