Seidler, in the application of Kathryn Seidler [2013] FCA 125

Seidler, in the application of Kathryn Seidler [2013] FCA 125

Leave was refused because the applicant's documents were incoherent, largely incomprehensible, sought orders in respect of long-public evidence and judgments, and constituted an abuse of process by seeking to go behind earlier judgments and orders already in place.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Application / Application for Leave to Commence or Continue Proceeding
Outcome
Leave to commence or continue a proceeding is refused.
Legal Topics
['vexatious Proceedings' 'leave to Commence Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure'] ['vexatious Proceedings' 'leave to Commence Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Application for Leave to Commence or Continue Proceeding

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to commence or continue a proceeding by a person subject to vexatious proceedings orders']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave was refused because the applicant's documents were incoherent, largely incomprehensible, sought orders in respect of long-public evidence and judgments, and constituted an abuse of process by seeking to go behind earlier judgments and orders already in place.

Court Disposition

Leave to commence or continue a proceeding is refused.

Orders

  • ['Leave to continue or commence a proceeding is refused.']