Seidler, in the application of Kathryn Seidler [2017] FCA 113

Seidler, in the application of Kathryn Seidler [2017] FCA 113

Leave to commence a proceeding is refused because the documents lodged by Ms Seidler are incomprehensible, rambling, and do not reveal any intelligible matter or arguable basis for invoking the Court's processes, amounting to an abuse of process.

Parties
Applicant: Kathryn Seidler
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Commence Proceeding / Determination of Application for Leave to Commence Proceeding After Vexatious Proceedings Order
Outcome
Leave to commence a proceeding is refused.
Legal Topics
Vexatious Proceedings, Leave to Commence Proceeding, Abuse of Process
Practice and Procedure Vexatious Proceedings Leave to Commence Proceeding Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kathryn Seidler

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Commence Proceeding / Determination of Application for Leave to Commence Proceeding After Vexatious Proceedings Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to commence a proceeding in the Federal Court should be granted to Ms Seidler despite a vexatious proceedings order prohibiting new proceedings without leave

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to commence a proceeding is refused because the documents lodged by Ms Seidler are incomprehensible, rambling, and do not reveal any intelligible matter or arguable basis for invoking the Court's processes, amounting to an abuse of process.

Court Disposition

Leave to commence a proceeding is refused.

Orders

  • Leave to commence a proceeding is refused.