Vadasz v Charas Constructions Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCATCD 59

Vadasz v Charas Constructions Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCATCD 59

The Tribunal had jurisdiction because the claim was a building claim within the statutory monetary limit and was brought within the applicable statutory warranty period by the successor-in-title. The evidence, particularly the Tuckwell reports, the Habak report and inferences arising from the Builder's failure to adduce contrary evidence, established breaches of the statutory warranties in relation to the carport roof installation and rust, lighting and electrical items, incomplete smoke alarm, electric gate motor, side pathway landscaping, stairway light surrounds, window stickers and front door alignment. The Owner did not prove reasonable rectification costs for compensation, but the...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Residential Building Work Building Claim for Breach of Statutory Warranties / Principal Judgment Following Hearing
Outcome
Pursuant to s 48O of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), the Tribunal ordered the Respondent Builder, within 21 days, to carry out specified rectification works.
Legal Topics
['defective and Incomplete Residential Building Work' 'statutory Warranties' 'rectification Orders' "inspector's Report" 'work Orders']
['home Building' 'consumer and Commercial' 'residential Building Work'] ['defective and Incomplete Residential Building Work' 'statutory Warranties' 'rectification Orders' "inspector's Report" 'work Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Residential Building Work Building Claim for Breach of Statutory Warranties / Principal Judgment Following Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the Owner's claims against the Builder." 'Whether the Builder breached the statutory warranties in s 18B of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) in relation to the carport, lighting, smoke alarm, electric gate motor, pathway, stairway light installation, stickers and front door.' 'Whether the Owner proved the reasonable cost of rectification so as to justify compensation orders.' 'Whether the evidence identified a sufficiently certain scope of work to permit rectification orders under s 48O of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW).']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal had jurisdiction because the claim was a building claim within the statutory monetary limit and was brought within the applicable statutory warranty period by the successor-in-title. The evidence, particularly the Tuckwell reports, the Habak report and inferences arising from the Builder's failure to adduce contrary evidence, established breaches of the statutory warranties in relation to the carport roof installation and rust, lighting and electrical items, incomplete smoke alarm, electric gate motor, side pathway landscaping, stairway light surrounds, window stickers and front door alignment. The Owner did not prove reasonable rectification costs for compensation, but the...

Court Disposition

Pursuant to s 48O of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), the Tribunal ordered the Respondent Builder, within 21 days, to carry out specified rectification works.

Orders

  • ['The removal of the carport roofing, and the installation of replacement roof sheeting with material described in an invoice from NFX Metal Roofing for the supply and installation dated 24 April 2017, to the minimum pitch, fall, maximum spans and the arrangement for fastenings which are described in item 2 (pages 4...