Remington v R [2018] NSWCCA 98
The sentencing judge erred by applying the Clark principle and failing to individually assess the criminality and circumstances of the offences, resulting in manifestly excessive sentences. The sentences must be quashed and the applicant re-sentenced appropriately, considering her personal circumstances and the correct legal principles.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Appeal After Sentence in District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentences quashed; applicant re-sentenced with terms including immediate parole release and community supervision.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeal' 'drug Offences' 'manifest Excess' 'objective and Subjective Circumstances' 'parole']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Appeal After Sentence in District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive' "Whether the applicant's offending constituted trafficking to a substantial degree" 'Whether a sentence other than a custodial sentence was available and/or appropriate' 'Failure to consider objective circumstances of the offending' "Failure to consider the applicant's subjective circumstances"]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by applying the Clark principle and failing to individually assess the criminality and circumstances of the offences, resulting in manifestly excessive sentences. The sentences must be quashed and the applicant re-sentenced appropriately, considering her personal circumstances and the correct legal principles.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentences quashed; applicant re-sentenced with terms including immediate parole release and community supervision.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'The appeal is allowed.' "The sentences imposed in the District Court at Nowra on 16 August 2017 are quashed and in lieu the following sentences are imposed: (a) For supplying 12.94 grams methamphetamine: 12 months' imprisonment from 16 August 2017, non-parole period 6 months expiring 15...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment