Wilkinson, Louise Elizabeth v Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty ltd [1986] FCA 676

Wilkinson, Louise Elizabeth v Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty ltd [1986] FCA 676

The defendants failed to adequately acknowledge and mitigate the risk of human error in labelling, resulting in contraventions of Trade Practices Act 1974 s.53(a), warranting criminal sanctions and fines.

Parties
Prosecutor: Louise Elizabeth Wilkinson; Defendant: Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty. Ltd.; Defendant: Arpel Australia Pty. Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 October 1986
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction and fines imposed
Legal Topics
Misrepresentation, Labelling, Criminal Sanctions, Sentencing
Consumer Law Trade Practices Law Misrepresentation Labelling Criminal Sanctions Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Louise Elizabeth Wilkinson

Prosecutor

Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty. Ltd.

Defendant

Arpel Australia Pty. Ltd.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Contraventions of s.53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974
  2. 2 Failure to detect human error in product labelling

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants failed to adequately acknowledge and mitigate the risk of human error in labelling, resulting in contraventions of Trade Practices Act 1974 s.53(a), warranting criminal sanctions and fines.

Court Disposition

Conviction and fines imposed

Orders

  • Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty. Ltd. convicted and fined $300 and ordered to pay prosecutor's costs (including costs reserved) in proceeding VG57 of 1985.
  • Arpel Australia Pty. Ltd. convicted and fined $300 in each proceeding VG60, VG62, and VG63 of 1985 and ordered to pay prosecutor's costs (including costs reserved) in those proceedings.