Polsen v Harrison (No. 3) [2021] NSWSC 125
The application for a stay is refused because there is uncertainty whether a refusal to recuse alone constitutes an appellable order, and established authority requires caution. The balance of convenience does not favour a stay; there is no compelling reason to exercise discretion to stay proceedings, and case management obligations require the trial to proceed unless and until proper grounds for interruption arise.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Proceedings / Interlocutory Application During Trial
- Outcome
- Application for stay refused
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Proceedings' 'recusal Application' 'leave to Appeal' 'apprehended Bias' 'case Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Proceedings / Interlocutory Application During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a stay of proceedings should be granted pending an application for leave to appeal the refusal to recuse the trial judge' 'Whether refusal to recuse alone is capable of being the subject of an interlocutory appeal' 'Appropriate exercise of discretion to grant or refuse a stay']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a stay is refused because there is uncertainty whether a refusal to recuse alone constitutes an appellable order, and established authority requires caution. The balance of convenience does not favour a stay; there is no compelling reason to exercise discretion to stay proceedings, and case management obligations require the trial to proceed unless and until proper grounds for interruption arise.
Court Disposition
Application for stay refused
Orders
- ["The plaintiff's application for a stay of proceedings is refused."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment