Parkyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 153
On the documents before the Court, the council determined DA 71/02 as a single childcare centre on the site containing two buildings with three separate childcare areas and associated facilities, not as three separate childcare centres.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal to Grant a S 96 Application to Amend Development Consent DA 71/02 / Preliminary Question of Fact
- Outcome
- Preliminary question answered in favour of the respondent's characterisation: DA 71/02 approved one childcare centre only.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'childcare Centres' 'development Control Plan Density Controls' 'preliminary Question of Fact']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal to Grant a S 96 Application to Amend Development Consent DA 71/02 / Preliminary Question of Fact
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the council approved DA 71/02 as three childcare centres on one site or one childcare centre consisting of two buildings and related facilities with three separate areas for childcare.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the documents before the Court, the council determined DA 71/02 as a single childcare centre on the site containing two buildings with three separate childcare areas and associated facilities, not as three separate childcare centres.
Court Disposition
Preliminary question answered in favour of the respondent's characterisation: DA 71/02 approved one childcare centre only.
Orders
- ['The council determined the proposal as a single childcare centre on the site containing two buildings with three separate areas for childcare within them and associated facilities.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment