McVey v State of New South Wales, in the matter of McVey (Bankrupt) [2012] FCA 455
Mrs McVey was under a liability not discharged by the Bankruptcy Act in respect of the disclaimed property due to the mortgage, had made all ongoing payments, the property was her home and only significant asset, and it is just and equitable for the property to vest in her. Consent from all relevant parties further supported the order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['vesting Order' 'disclaimed Property' 'liability Under Mortgage']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mrs McVey is entitled to a vesting order under s 133(9) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for property disclaimed by the bankruptcy trustee']
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs McVey was under a liability not discharged by the Bankruptcy Act in respect of the disclaimed property due to the mortgage, had made all ongoing payments, the property was her home and only significant asset, and it is just and equitable for the property to vest in her. Consent from all relevant parties further supported the order.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['The estate in fee simple in the land described in Folio Identifier 17/250194 vest in Kay McVey, who becomes sole registered proprietor pursuant to s 133(9) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).' 'Each party pay its own costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment