DPP v KC [2006] NSWDC 127
The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was driving on the incorrect side of Raglan Street at a speed not less than 70–80 km/h, most probably 75–80 km/h, which, in the circumstances, was dangerous to the passengers and constituted dangerous driving occasioning death and grievous bodily harm. The prosecution proved the offences as charged and no reasonable doubt was raised by the appellant’s alternative hypothesis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Conviction Appeal Rehearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; finding of guilt confirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['dangerous Driving Occasioning Death' 'dangerous Driving Occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Conviction Appeal Rehearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant drove in a manner dangerous to other persons within section 52A of the Crimes Act' "Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant's speed was dangerous in the circumstances" "Whether the evidence supports the appellant's hypothesis of reacting to an unforeseen hazard"]
Ratio Decidendi
The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was driving on the incorrect side of Raglan Street at a speed not less than 70–80 km/h, most probably 75–80 km/h, which, in the circumstances, was dangerous to the passengers and constituted dangerous driving occasioning death and grievous bodily harm. The prosecution proved the offences as charged and no reasonable doubt was raised by the appellant’s alternative hypothesis.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; finding of guilt confirmed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed and the finding of guilt in respect of each Court Attendance Notice is confirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment