KE -v- Protective Commissioner [2004] NSWADT 59
In the circumstances, the applicant’s wish to retain certain properties is to be taken into account but cannot override the need for substantial funds to be generated. A stay should continue in relation to the 6 Porter Avenue property, but the restriction on sale of 1 Miller Street, Petersham is lifted, allowing its sale. This balances the applicant’s interests, expert advice, and need for financial resources.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Preliminary/interlocutory Decision Regarding Stay of Protective Commissioner’s Decision
- Outcome
- Partial grant of stay; refusal in part
- Legal Topics
- ['protected Estates Act' 'powers of Protective Commissioner' 'financial Management Orders' 'stay of Administrative Decision' 'property Sale of Protected Persons']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Preliminary/interlocutory Decision Regarding Stay of Protective Commissioner’s Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the implementation of the Protective Commissioner's decision to sell applicant’s properties should be stayed pending the substantive application" "Which of the two properties, if any, should be permitted to be sold in the applicant's best interests"]
Ratio Decidendi
In the circumstances, the applicant’s wish to retain certain properties is to be taken into account but cannot override the need for substantial funds to be generated. A stay should continue in relation to the 6 Porter Avenue property, but the restriction on sale of 1 Miller Street, Petersham is lifted, allowing its sale. This balances the applicant’s interests, expert advice, and need for financial resources.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of stay; refusal in part
Orders
- ['Refuse application in respect of 1 Miller Street, Petersham' 'Continue to stay the Protective Commissioner’s decision as it relates to 6 Porter Avenue, Marrickville' 'Adjourn costs application to relist date' 'Proceedings relisted to 8 April 2004 for telephone conference']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment