Keen Mar Corp. Pty Ltd & Anor v Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd & Anor [1988] FCA 216
Leave should be given to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time because the applicants' explanation for delay is credible and they should not be unfairly prevented from participating in appellate proceedings involving their co-applicants and common issues.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd; Applicant: Alan Keen; Applicant: Trudy Keen; First Respondent: Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Hersfield Developments Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the applicants to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appeals, Discretion, Common Law Claim
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd
Applicant
Alan Keen
Applicant
Trudy Keen
Applicant
Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Hersfield Developments Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time
- 2 Adequacy of reasons for delay under Order 52 rule 15(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Leave should be given to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time because the applicants' explanation for delay is credible and they should not be unfairly prevented from participating in appellate proceedings involving their co-applicants and common issues.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the applicants to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time.
Orders
- Leave is given to the applicants to file and serve a notice of appeal by 4 pm Monday 9 May 1988.
- The costs of the respondents to this application are the respondents' costs in the proposed appeal, and if the present applicants do not file an appeal, the costs will be the respondents' costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment