Payne v Valuer General [2005] NSWLEC 106

Payne v Valuer General [2005] NSWLEC 106

Where planning restrictions and hazard controls such as coastal hazard lines prevent rebuilding, but continued use of an existing dwelling is permissible, land valuation should be determined under s 6A(2) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, using comparable sales of similarly affected properties and making appropriate adjustments for hazard impact, topography, and other relevant factors.

Parties
Applicant: Keith David Payne; Respondent: Valuer General
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Valuation Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Appeal upheld; valuation reduced
Legal Topics
Valuation of Land, Coastal Hazard Zones, Planned Retreat, Land Value Appeals
Property Law Valuation of Land Coastal Hazard Zones Planned Retreat Land Value Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keith David Payne

Applicant

Valuer General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Valuation Appeal / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Proper method of land valuation under the Valuation of Land Act 1916 for land affected by coastal hazard zones
  2. 2 Whether the coastal hazard and specific planning restrictions justify departure from standard valuation methods

Ratio Decidendi

Where planning restrictions and hazard controls such as coastal hazard lines prevent rebuilding, but continued use of an existing dwelling is permissible, land valuation should be determined under s 6A(2) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, using comparable sales of similarly affected properties and making appropriate adjustments for hazard impact, topography, and other relevant factors.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; valuation reduced

Orders

  • The appeal in respect of the property known as No. 68 Kalakau Avenue, Forresters Beach, is upheld.
  • The valuation of $993,000 for the above property as at the base date of 1 July 2003 is adjusted to a land value of $850,000.