Mills v Complete Hospitality Training [1996] IRCA 227

Mills v Complete Hospitality Training [1996] IRCA 227

The applicant was an excluded casual employee engaged for a short period under Regulation 30B, and there was no termination at the initiative of the employer; thus the application lacks jurisdiction and is dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Keith Graham Mills; Respondent: Complete Hospitality Training
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 May 1996
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, Casual Employment, Jurisdiction Under Industrial Relations Act
Industrial Law Termination of Employment Casual Employment Jurisdiction Under Industrial Relations Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keith Graham Mills

Applicant

Complete Hospitality Training

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Law Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether applicant was unlawfully terminated from employment
  2. 2 Whether applicant was a casual employee excluded under s.170CC and Regulation 30B
  3. 3 Whether there was termination at the initiative of the employer

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was an excluded casual employee engaged for a short period under Regulation 30B, and there was no termination at the initiative of the employer; thus the application lacks jurisdiction and is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • That the application be dismissed.