Fitzpatrick v Lithgow and District Workmens Club Limited (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 374
In the exercise of the Court's discretion, considering both parties’ conduct and the partial utility of the proceedings for clarification, the Plaintiff should pay one half of the Defendant’s costs of the proceedings, calculated on the ordinary basis, but not including the costs of the argument on costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment (costs)
- Outcome
- Order for Plaintiff to pay half of Defendant's costs, ordinary basis; each party to bear own costs of argument on costs; exhibits to be dealt with as per Uniform Civil Procedure Rules.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment (costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Appropriate order for costs following dismissal of Plaintiff's Summons"]
Ratio Decidendi
In the exercise of the Court's discretion, considering both parties’ conduct and the partial utility of the proceedings for clarification, the Plaintiff should pay one half of the Defendant’s costs of the proceedings, calculated on the ordinary basis, but not including the costs of the argument on costs.
Court Disposition
Order for Plaintiff to pay half of Defendant's costs, ordinary basis; each party to bear own costs of argument on costs; exhibits to be dealt with as per Uniform Civil Procedure Rules.
Orders
- ["Plaintiff to pay one half of Defendant's costs of the proceedings, such costs to be calculated on the ordinary basis" 'Such costs should not include the costs of the argument on costs, in respect of which each party should bear his, or its, own costs' 'Exhibits to be dealt with in accordance with the Uniform Civil...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment