Davis v Public Trustee; Kelleners v Public Trustee [2007] NSWSC 731

Davis v Public Trustee; Kelleners v Public Trustee [2007] NSWSC 731

Keith Robert Davis was an eligible person as he was partly dependent on Tommy for accommodation and support after Tommy inherited the property; adequate and proper provision required a legacy of $600,000. Jean Alison Kelleners was not directly dependent on Tommy during the relevant period, her dependency was upon...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Application Under Family Provision Act 1982 / Judgment
Outcome
Keith Robert Davis’ claim succeeded, Jean Alison Kelleners’ claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
['dependency' 'family Provision Act Eligibility' 'provision for Maintenance' 'extension of Time']
['family Provision' 'succession' 'equity'] ['dependency' 'family Provision Act Eligibility' 'provision for Maintenance' 'extension of Time']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under Family Provision Act 1982 / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicants are eligible persons under the Family Provision Act 1982' 'Whether the applicants were dependent on the deceased for the purposes of the Act' 'Whether the claim for an extension of time should be granted' 'Whether there are factors warranting the making of an application' 'Whether the applicants have been left without adequate provision for proper maintenance']

Ratio Decidendi

Keith Robert Davis was an eligible person as he was partly dependent on Tommy for accommodation and support after Tommy inherited the property; adequate and proper provision required a legacy of $600,000. Jean Alison Kelleners was not directly dependent on Tommy during the relevant period, her dependency was upon her mother, and thus her claim under the Act was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Keith Robert Davis’ claim succeeded, Jean Alison Kelleners’ claim dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Legacy of $600,000 from the estate to Keith Robert Davis.' 'Jean Alison Kelleners’ claim dismissed.' 'Costs of Keith Robert Davis and defendant in both proceedings to be paid or retained out of the estate.' 'No order as to costs of Jean Alison Kelleners (subject to submissions).' 'Reserve liberty to apply in...