Keli LANE v Regina [2013] NSWSC 146
The applicant did not establish special or exceptional circumstances under s 30AA because neither relied-upon appeal ground was shown to be most likely to succeed. There was no evidence at trial of an unlawful and dangerous act capable of supporting manslaughter, and the complaint about the Crown Prosecutor's questions required detailed appellate analysis, especially given that the questions were grounded in the evidence, no objection was taken at trial, and the trial judge clearly directed the jury that the defence bore no onus of proof.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Application / Application for Bail Pending Conviction Appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Bail refused
- Legal Topics
- ['bail After Conviction for Murder' 'special or Exceptional Circumstances Under S 30 AA of the Bail Act 1978 (nsw)' 'prospects of Success on Appeal' 'alternative Verdict of Manslaughter' 'onus of Proof in Crown Closing Address']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Application / Application for Bail Pending Conviction Appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special or exceptional circumstances existed under s 30AA of the Bail Act 1978 (NSW) justifying bail pending appeal.' 'Whether the appeal ground alleging failure to leave manslaughter to the jury was most likely to succeed.' "Whether the appeal ground alleging miscarriage from the Crown Prosecutor's questions in closing address and reversal of the onus of proof was most likely to succeed."]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not establish special or exceptional circumstances under s 30AA because neither relied-upon appeal ground was shown to be most likely to succeed. There was no evidence at trial of an unlawful and dangerous act capable of supporting manslaughter, and the complaint about the Crown Prosecutor's questions required detailed appellate analysis, especially given that the questions were grounded in the evidence, no objection was taken at trial, and the trial judge clearly directed the jury that the defence bore no onus of proof.
Court Disposition
Bail refused
Orders
- ['Bail is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment