Kell & Rigby Building Pty Limited v Shephard [2011] FCA 324

Kell & Rigby Building Pty Limited v Shephard [2011] FCA 324

There was no reasonable basis for suspicion that the Company was not insolvent when the voluntary administrator was appointed; the plaintiff commenced proceedings precipitately and must bear the defendants' costs on an indemnity basis.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Corporations Litigation / Costs Order Following Dismissal of Proceeding
Outcome
Plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs on an indemnity basis.
Legal Topics
['voluntary Administration' 'solvency' 'abuse of Process' 'indemnity Costs']
['corporations Law' 'insolvency Law'] ['voluntary Administration' 'solvency' 'abuse of Process' 'indemnity Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Litigation / Costs Order Following Dismissal of Proceeding

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a basis for questioning the insolvency of Blue Mountains Megacinema Pty Limited at the time of the appointment of the voluntary administrator' 'Whether the proceeding by the plaintiff was justified or precipitately commenced' 'Whether costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no reasonable basis for suspicion that the Company was not insolvent when the voluntary administrator was appointed; the plaintiff commenced proceedings precipitately and must bear the defendants' costs on an indemnity basis.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff ordered to pay defendants' costs on an indemnity basis.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs on an indemnity basis."]