Kelly's (Coleambally) Pty Ltd v Malone [2001] NSWCA 146

Kelly's (Coleambally) Pty Ltd v Malone [2001] NSWCA 146

Negligence was not established because there was no evidence the appellant failed to warn or instruct the respondent about the presence of the dog, the risk was obvious and known to the respondent, and causation between carrying the box and the accident was not made out. The appellant was entitled to rely on the respondent taking reasonable care for her own safety in the circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Liability and Quantum From District Court
Outcome
Appeal upheld
Legal Topics
['personal Injury' "employer's Liability" 'negligence' 'duty of Care' 'safe System of Work']
['tort Law'] ['personal Injury' "employer's Liability" 'negligence' 'duty of Care' 'safe System of Work']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Liability and Quantum From District Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Was the employer negligent in failing to warn or instruct the employee about the risks posed by the dog?' 'Did the employer breach its duty to provide a safe system of work?' "Was there causation between the alleged negligence and the respondent's injury?"]

Ratio Decidendi

Negligence was not established because there was no evidence the appellant failed to warn or instruct the respondent about the presence of the dog, the risk was obvious and known to the respondent, and causation between carrying the box and the accident was not made out. The appellant was entitled to rely on the respondent taking reasonable care for her own safety in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • ['Verdict set aside' 'Verdict entered in favour of the appellant' "Respondent's claim dismissed with costs" 'Respondent to pay the costs of the appeal' 'Respondent to receive a Suitors Fund certificate if otherwise entitled' 'Respondent to repay the money paid to the appellant, with interest at Court judgment rates...