Re the Estate of V D Bolton [2002] NSWSC 235
There was insufficient evidence to establish that the act of writing 'cancelled' across a copy of the will constituted testamentary intention to revoke the 1994 will; neither s17(3) nor s18A could be satisfied on the facts; therefore, probate of the will was granted to the named executor.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Probate granted
- Legal Topics
- ['probate' 'will Revocation' 'intestacy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the will dated 2 March 1994 was revoked by writing 'cancelled' with testator's signature across a copy of the will" 'Whether s17(3) of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 applies to actions involving a copy' 'Whether revocation can be effected under s18A of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898']
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence to establish that the act of writing 'cancelled' across a copy of the will constituted testamentary intention to revoke the 1994 will; neither s17(3) nor s18A could be satisfied on the facts; therefore, probate of the will was granted to the named executor.
Court Disposition
Probate granted
Orders
- ['Order that probate of the will dated 2 March 1994 of Valerie Dawn Evans be granted to Kelvin Henry Noldt, the executor named in the said will and it be referred to the Registrar to complete the grant.' 'Direct that the costs of all parties to be paid out of the estate, those of the executor on the indemnity basis.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment