Tam v Cox [2024] NSWCATAP 206

Tam v Cox [2024] NSWCATAP 206

The orders made by the Tribunal were consistent with the language of the relevant statute and raised no error of law. No substantial miscarriage of justice or grounds for leave to appeal were established. Any issues with post-order conduct or new evidence did not justify appellate intervention.

Parties
Appellant: Ken Tam; Respondent: Nick Cox
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
Outcome
Extension of time granted; leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Dividing Fences, Appeals, Extension of Time, Standards for Repair, Miscarriage of Justice
Civil Law Dividing Fences Appeals Extension of Time Standards for Repair Miscarriage of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ken Tam

Appellant

Nick Cox

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in failing to define 'reasonable standard' in Order 1A
  2. 2 Whether refusal to admit new evidence was justified
  3. 3 Whether the decision was unfair or against the weight of evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The orders made by the Tribunal were consistent with the language of the relevant statute and raised no error of law. No substantial miscarriage of justice or grounds for leave to appeal were established. Any issues with post-order conduct or new evidence did not justify appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted; leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The time for lodging the Notice of Appeal is extended to 26 July 2024.
  • Leave to appeal is refused.