Howe v Rosier & Anor; King v Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) & Anor [2001] NSWSC 1194

Howe v Rosier & Anor; King v Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) & Anor [2001] NSWSC 1194

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate more than a merely theoretical apprehension of bias in the Regulatory Committee’s handling of the charges. Neither prior exposure to inadmissible evidence nor statutory responsibilities, absent positive evidence of prejudgment or direct interest, can disqualify the Committee or any member. Procedural fairness, as adjusted for the statutory regime, was met and the rule of necessity required the Committee to act. The summonses were dismissed.

Parties
Plaintiff: Kenneth Edward Howe; First Defendant: Stephen Rosier; Second Defendant: Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW); Plaintiff: Raymond Thomas King; First Defendant: Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW); Second Defendant: The Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Application for Declarations and an Order Prohibiting a Disciplinary Tribunal From Hearing Charges Due to Apprehended Bias / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Summonses dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Apprehended Bias, Procedural Fairness, Statutory Interpretation, Disciplinary Proceedings, Natural Justice, Rule of Necessity
Administrative Law Sports Law Apprehended Bias Procedural Fairness Statutory Interpretation Disciplinary Proceedings Natural Justice Rule of Necessity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenneth Edward Howe

Plaintiff

Stephen Rosier

First Defendant

Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW)

Second Defendant

Raymond Thomas King

Plaintiff

Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW)

First Defendant

The Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW)

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Declarations and an Order Prohibiting a Disciplinary Tribunal From Hearing Charges Due to Apprehended Bias / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Regulatory Committee of the Greyhound Racing Authority (NSW) was disqualified from hearing and determining charges against the plaintiffs by reason of apprehended bias due to exposure to potentially prejudicial, inadmissible material and prior involvement with investigations leading to the charges

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate more than a merely theoretical apprehension of bias in the Regulatory Committee’s handling of the charges. Neither prior exposure to inadmissible evidence nor statutory responsibilities, absent positive evidence of prejudgment or direct interest, can disqualify the Committee or any member. Procedural fairness, as adjusted for the statutory regime, was met and the rule of necessity required the Committee to act. The summonses were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Summonses dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Summonses dismissed with costs.