Hallgath v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (No 2) [2011] FCA 1074
On the true construction of item 201(a) in Sch 2 of the Ministerial Determination, it is sufficient that the applicant has, at the date of application and at the date of recommendation decision, a present legal right to occupy the proposed premises even if actual occupancy begins later. The Authority had evidence of such right from the executed lease, and was therefore entitled to be satisfied that the requirement was met.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenneth Hallgath; First Respondent: Australian Community Pharmacy Authority; Second Respondent: The Secretary of the Department of Health and Ageing; Third Respondent: CKK Services Pty Ltd ACN 151 255 060
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review – No Evidence Ground, Ministerial Determination Construction, Approval of Pharmacy Premises, Legal Right to Occupy Premises Under Lease
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Hallgath
Applicant
Australian Community Pharmacy Authority
First Respondent
The Secretary of the Department of Health and Ageing
Second Respondent
CKK Services Pty Ltd ACN 151 255 060
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Authority had evidence that CKK Services had a legal right to occupy the proposed premises at the relevant dates
- 2 Proper construction of item 201(a) in Sch 2 to the National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2006 – does right to occupy require immediate occupancy or a present legal right regardless of when occupancy commences
Ratio Decidendi
On the true construction of item 201(a) in Sch 2 of the Ministerial Determination, it is sufficient that the applicant has, at the date of application and at the date of recommendation decision, a present legal right to occupy the proposed premises even if actual occupancy begins later. The Authority had evidence of such right from the executed lease, and was therefore entitled to be satisfied that the requirement was met.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application as amended is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the third respondent's costs of and incidental to the application to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment