Davies v Kyogle Council [2008] NSWIRComm 68
The applicant failed to show sufficient reason or an appropriate case to grant a stay. No evidence was provided to support granting a stay, and the appeal had little prospect of success, especially as leave to appeal against interlocutory procedural decisions is rarely granted. Granting a stay would inconvenience the parties and the proceedings.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kenneth Henry Davies; Respondent: Kyogle Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision / Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of proceedings refused
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Interlocutory Appeal, Service of Court Documents, Leave to Appeal, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Henry Davies
Appellant
Kyogle Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision / Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay of proceedings should be granted pending appeal against interlocutory decision
- 2 Whether service of affidavits and notices of motion complied with Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996
- 3 Whether leave to appeal an interlocutory procedural decision should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to show sufficient reason or an appropriate case to grant a stay. No evidence was provided to support granting a stay, and the appeal had little prospect of success, especially as leave to appeal against interlocutory procedural decisions is rarely granted. Granting a stay would inconvenience the parties and the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Stay of proceedings refused
Orders
- Stay declined; reasons for refusal to be provided as soon as practicable
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment