Regina v O'Meara [2001] NSWCCA 195

Regina v O'Meara [2001] NSWCCA 195

No error was shown in the magistrates' discretionary decisions to adjourn the committal proceedings. The adjournments were made under s 48G of the Justices Act 1902, a specific provision relating to written statements in committal proceedings, and were not constrained by the eight-day limit in s 33. Accordingly, there was no basis to grant leave to appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Applications Under S 5 F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Orders in Committal Proceedings / Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal declined.
Legal Topics
['committal Proceedings' 'adjournments' 'interlocutory Appeals' 'exercise of Discretion' 'statutory Construction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Applications Under S 5 F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Orders in Committal Proceedings / Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the magistrates should have adjourned the committal proceedings at all.' 'Whether, if the proceedings were adjourned, s 33 of the Justices Act 1902 required the adjournments to be for a period not exceeding eight days unless the applicant consented.']

Ratio Decidendi

No error was shown in the magistrates' discretionary decisions to adjourn the committal proceedings. The adjournments were made under s 48G of the Justices Act 1902, a specific provision relating to written statements in committal proceedings, and were not constrained by the eight-day limit in s 33. Accordingly, there was no basis to grant leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal declined.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal declined.']