R v Hagarty [2004] NSWCCA 89

R v Hagarty [2004] NSWCCA 89

The trial judge did not err in her directions regarding the use of relationship evidence and alleged admissions, did not need to direct the jury to apply the criminal standard of proof to relationship evidence, and adequately instructed the jury not to use such evidence as tendency evidence. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Kenneth James Hagarty
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Sexual Offences, Relationship Evidence, Standard of Proof, Jury Directions
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Sexual Offences Relationship Evidence Standard of Proof Jury Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Kenneth James Hagarty

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether relationship evidence may be used otherwise than as tendency evidence
  2. 2 Whether the standard of proof for relationship evidence is beyond reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Adequacy of jury directions regarding use of relationship evidence and alleged admissions

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge did not err in her directions regarding the use of relationship evidence and alleged admissions, did not need to direct the jury to apply the criminal standard of proof to relationship evidence, and adequately instructed the jury not to use such evidence as tendency evidence. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed