Day, Kenneth Leonard v Mount, Michael Jaunay [1984] FCA 88
A provisional liquidator is not disentitled to remuneration solely on the basis that the winding-up petition was dismissed; entitlement accrues during valid appointment, and court retains power to make relevant orders thereafter.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed (subject to variations)
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' 'provisional Liquidator' 'remuneration' 'dismissal of Petition' 'court Powers']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the provisional liquidator is entitled to remuneration after the winding-up petition has been dismissed' "Whether the provisional liquidator's appointment becomes ineffective ab initio due to petition dismissal" "Court's power to make orders regarding provisional liquidator's remuneration after petition dismissal"]
Ratio Decidendi
A provisional liquidator is not disentitled to remuneration solely on the basis that the winding-up petition was dismissed; entitlement accrues during valid appointment, and court retains power to make relevant orders thereafter.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed (subject to variations)
Orders
- ['Declaration that the provisional liquidator is not disentitled to remuneration by reason only of the dismissal of the petition.' "Appellant's summons dated 2 August 1983 adjourned to date to be fixed." "Order of Supreme Court (28 October 1983) for applicant to pay provisional liquidator's costs set aside." 'Costs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment