Magnus v South Pacific Air Motive Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 465
Where claimants suffered recognisable psychological injuries as a consequence of witnessing or believing their children were killed or endangered in an aviation accident, damages for nervous shock may be assessed. The injury must be beyond normal emotional disturbance and constitute psychiatric disorder or adjustment disorder, provable on evidence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenneth Magnus; Group Member: Marilyn Ann Magnus; Group Member: James Garrey Hall Maxwell; First Respondent: South Pacific Air Motive Pty Limited; Second Respondent: Group Air Pty Limited; Third Respondent: Civil Aviation Safety Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Damages Assessment Nervous Shock / Assessment of Damages Prior to Liability Determination
- Outcome
- Damages assessed for Mr Magnus, Mrs Magnus, and Dr Maxwell; judgment not entered pending further orders and possible settlement.
- Legal Topics
- Nervous Shock, Psychiatric Injury, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Magnus
Applicant
Marilyn Ann Magnus
Group Member
James Garrey Hall Maxwell
Group Member
South Pacific Air Motive Pty Limited
First Respondent
Group Air Pty Limited
Second Respondent
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Damages Assessment Nervous Shock / Assessment of Damages Prior to Liability Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 whether damages for nervous shock are available to parents whose children were exposed to danger but not physically injured
- 2 whether each claimant suffered a psychological injury constituting compensable nervous shock
- 3 extent and assessment of psychological injury sustained
Ratio Decidendi
Where claimants suffered recognisable psychological injuries as a consequence of witnessing or believing their children were killed or endangered in an aviation accident, damages for nervous shock may be assessed. The injury must be beyond normal emotional disturbance and constitute psychiatric disorder or adjustment disorder, provable on evidence.
Court Disposition
Damages assessed for Mr Magnus, Mrs Magnus, and Dr Maxwell; judgment not entered pending further orders and possible settlement.
Orders
- The proceeding be listed for mention at 9.30am on Friday, 25 May 2001.
- No orders made at this stage regarding the claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment