Rothe v Scott [2015] NSWDC 105
The defence of justification was struck out as the particulars provided were wholly deficient, did not adequately address the pleaded imputations, and there was a refusal to provide further particulars making the defence untenable.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kenneth Rothe; Defendant: David Scott
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Defence
- Outcome
- Defence of justification struck out; case referred to mediation; matter stood over for further directions
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Pleadings, Defence of Justification, Pleading Requirements, Particulars of Justification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Rothe
Plaintiff
David Scott
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defence of justification pleaded by the defendant discloses an arguable defence or is so deficient as to be struck out
- 2 The circumstances in which a plea of justification will be struck out in defamation proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The defence of justification was struck out as the particulars provided were wholly deficient, did not adequately address the pleaded imputations, and there was a refusal to provide further particulars making the defence untenable.
Court Disposition
Defence of justification struck out; case referred to mediation; matter stood over for further directions
Orders
- Strike out the defence of justification in paragraph 6A.
- Pursuant to s 26 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), direct the parties to attend for mediation before an assistant registrar of the District Court on Tuesday 16 June 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment