Kenoss Pty Ltd v Palerang Council (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 208
Clause 21(b) of the Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 provides that consent must not be granted to subdivision in Zone No 2(v) unless the consent authority is satisfied that the subdivision does not take in unsuitable areas such as floodplain land. The phrase "such as floodplain land" identifies floodplain land as an example of an unsuitable area. Accordingly, if a subdivision in the Village Zone takes in floodplain land, consent cannot be granted and there is no further inquiry into whether that floodplain land is unsuitable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of a Development Application for Subdivision of Land / Preliminary and Separate Question
- Outcome
- Separate question answered (a) Yes, and (b) No.
- Legal Topics
- ['subdivision Consent in Village Zone' 'floodplain Land' 'yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 Cl 21(b)' 'condition Precedent to Grant of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of a Development Application for Subdivision of Land / Preliminary and Separate Question
Legal Issues
- 1 ['On the proper construction of cl 21(b) of the Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002, whether the only question is whether the consent authority is satisfied that the subdivision takes in floodplain land.' 'Whether cl 21(b) also requires a further question whether the consent authority is satisfied that the floodplain land is an unsuitable area.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 21(b) of the Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 provides that consent must not be granted to subdivision in Zone No 2(v) unless the consent authority is satisfied that the subdivision does not take in unsuitable areas such as floodplain land. The phrase "such as floodplain land" identifies floodplain land as an example of an unsuitable area. Accordingly, if a subdivision in the Village Zone takes in floodplain land, consent cannot be granted and there is no further inquiry into whether that floodplain land is unsuitable.
Court Disposition
Separate question answered (a) Yes, and (b) No.
Orders
- ['The preliminary question was answered: (a) Yes; and (b) No.' 'The exhibits may be returned.' 'The matter will be listed before the Registrar on 12 September 2012.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment