Kerslake Superannuation Pty Ltd v C & L Building Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 424
The statutory demand should be varied to reflect the quantified offsetting claim for concreting defects, reducing the demand to $8,214.18, as the claim was genuine and sufficiently raised in the original affidavit.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Winding Up in Insolvency Statutory Demand / Application Under S 459 G to Set Aside or Vary Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Statutory demand varied and declared to have effect as so varied; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'adjudication Certificate' 'concreting Defects']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up in Insolvency Statutory Demand / Application Under S 459 G to Set Aside or Vary Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the statutory demand should be set aside or varied based on an offsetting claim' 'Extent to which offsetting claim must be quantified in the supporting affidavit under s 459G' 'Genuineness of the offsetting claim']
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory demand should be varied to reflect the quantified offsetting claim for concreting defects, reducing the demand to $8,214.18, as the claim was genuine and sufficiently raised in the original affidavit.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand varied and declared to have effect as so varied; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Order that the statutory demand dated 3 February 2010 be varied by reducing the amount to $8,214.18.' 'Declare that the statutory demand is to have had effect as so varied as from when the statutory demand was served on the plaintiff.' 'No order as to costs; each party to bear its own costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment