Galloway, K.A. v. Mapmakers Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 464

Misrepresentations by the respondent regarding the availability of electricity and road works, confirmed by advertisement and salesman's statements, influenced the applicant's decision to enter into the contract. The contract is void ab initio under sections 52 and 53A of the Trade Practices Act, 1974, entitling the applicant to a refund and costs.

Parties: Applicant: Kevin Albert Galloway; Respondent: Mapmakers Pty. Limited
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 05 September 1985
Procedural Posture: Civil / Judgment
Outcome: Contract declared void ab initio; refund and costs awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics: Misrepresentation, Rescission, Void Ab Initio, Trade Practices Act

Contract Law Consumer Protection Misrepresentation Rescission Void Ab Initio Trade Practices Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Kevin Albert Galloway

Applicant

Mapmakers Pty. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether misrepresentations were made by the respondent regarding electricity, road, and finance clauses
2 Whether the applicant relied on the misrepresentations
3 Whether the contract is void ab initio under the Trade Practices Act 1974

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Contract declared void ab initio; refund and costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

The contract referred to in the Statement of Claim and Application is declared void ab initio.
The respondent refund to the applicant the sum of $1295, together with interest in the sum of $60.