Brown v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1371
Proceedings were disposed of by consent orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as the Court was satisfied the outcome was within its powers, without making a merit assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kevin Brown; Respondent: Inner West Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Development Application / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld by consent orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Development Application approved with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Mixed Use Development, Heritage, Bulk and Scale, Waste Management, Conciliation Conference, Agreement Between Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Brown
Applicant
Inner West Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Development Application / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amended plans and documentation should be approved for the proposed development
- 2 Approval of Development Application D/2015/390 for demolition and construction of mixed use development
Ratio Decidendi
Proceedings were disposed of by consent orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, as the Court was satisfied the outcome was within its powers, without making a merit assessment of the issues originally in dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld by consent orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Development Application approved with conditions
Orders
- The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documentation as referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure 'A'.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment