Buzzacott v Gray [1999] FCA 1525

Buzzacott v Gray [1999] FCA 1525

The interlocutory injunction was refused because the applicant did not establish a serious question to be tried on any asserted ground of invalidity; in any event, the application was brought at the eleventh hour, the applicant and represented persons would not suffer irreparable injury because validity could still be challenged after approval and assent, exceptional circumstances were not shown, no adequate undertaking or security for damages was offered, and the balance of convenience strongly favoured allowing the referendum to proceed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 November 1999
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding Under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth) Seeking Declarations and Injunctions Concerning Proposed Constitutional Alteration Referendums / Interlocutory Application for an Interim Injunction Restraining the Holding of the Referendum Vote on 6 November 1999 and Related Steps
Outcome
Application for interlocutory injunction refused; further consideration and first directions hearing adjourned; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['constitutional Alteration by Referendum' 'interlocutory Injunction' 'section 128 of the Constitution' 'australia Acts 1986' 'pre Enactment Challenge to Proposed Laws' 'aboriginal Sovereignty and Genocide Allegations']
['constitutional Law' 'civil Procedure' 'representative Proceedings'] ['constitutional Alteration by Referendum' 'interlocutory Injunction' 'section 128 of the Constitution' 'australia Acts 1986' 'pre Enactment Challenge to Proposed Laws' 'aboriginal Sovereignty and Genocide Allegations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Representative Proceeding Under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth) Seeking Declarations and Injunctions Concerning Proposed Constitutional Alteration Referendums / Interlocutory Application for an Interim Injunction Restraining the Holding of the Referendum Vote on 6 November 1999 and Related Steps

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant established a serious question to be tried as to the invalidity of the proposed laws for Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) 1999 and Constitution Alteration (Preamble) 1999.' 'Whether s 128 of the Constitution can be altered using the referendum procedure specified in s 128.' 'Whether s 15 of the Australia Acts 1986 required agreement or request of the States before the proposed constitutional alterations could proceed.' 'Whether there is an implied prohibition on constitutional amendment without the consent of Aboriginal Nations.' 'Whether the applicant would suffer irreparable injury for which damages would not be adequate compensation if the injunction were refused.' 'Whether the balance of convenience favoured restraining the referendum shortly before it was to occur.' 'Whether the absence of an undertaking or security as to damages weighed against interlocutory relief.']

Ratio Decidendi

The interlocutory injunction was refused because the applicant did not establish a serious question to be tried on any asserted ground of invalidity; in any event, the application was brought at the eleventh hour, the applicant and represented persons would not suffer irreparable injury because validity could still be challenged after approval and assent, exceptional circumstances were not shown, no adequate undertaking or security for damages was offered, and the balance of convenience strongly favoured allowing the referendum to proceed.

Court Disposition

Application for interlocutory injunction refused; further consideration and first directions hearing adjourned; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ['Application for interlocutory injunction refused.' "Further consideration of the proceedings and the first directions' hearing adjourned to 9.15 am on Monday 6 December 1999." 'Question of costs reserved.']