Buzzacott v Hill [1999] FCA 639
There is no factual or legal basis for restraining the Australian Government Solicitor from representing the respondents; allegations of professional misconduct against counsel do not justify injunctive relief; the issues regarding the existence of domestic genocide law and issues raised in strike-out applications are pending determination before a differently constituted Full Court and should not be determined in parallel.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application and Notices of Motion in Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Orders and Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed; various notices of motion dismissed or stood over; strike-out application adjourned; all costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['genocide in Domestic Law' 'jurisdiction of Australian Courts' 'government Legal Representation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application and Notices of Motion in Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Orders and Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there is a prohibition of genocide in Australian domestic law' 'Whether the Australian Government Solicitor can represent Ministers accused of genocide' 'Whether alleged misconduct by opposing counsel justifies injunctive relief restraining legal representation']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no factual or legal basis for restraining the Australian Government Solicitor from representing the respondents; allegations of professional misconduct against counsel do not justify injunctive relief; the issues regarding the existence of domestic genocide law and issues raised in strike-out applications are pending determination before a differently constituted Full Court and should not be determined in parallel.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; various notices of motion dismissed or stood over; strike-out application adjourned; all costs reserved.
Orders
- ["The applicant's application for leave to appeal against the orders of O'Loughlin J made on 1 April 1999 is dismissed." "The applicant's notice of motion dated 29 March 1999 is dismissed save for paragraphs 2, 4 and 5 which are stood over." "The applicant's notice of motion dated 8 April 1999 is dismissed save for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment