Stewart v Mayne Nickless Ltd [2001] NSWCC 3
The applicant is entitled to interest on the net sum of $40,083.72, representing the difference between compensation entitled and Social Security payments received, from 3 December 1984 to 17 June 1998 at 6% per annum. The delay by the applicant was sufficiently explained and does not disentitle him from interest.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kevin Eric Stewart; Respondent: Mayne Nickless Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation / Post Award Motion for Interest and Costs
- Outcome
- Interest awarded to applicant; respondent to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Arrears, Delay in Prosecution, Entitlement to Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Eric Stewart
Applicant
Mayne Nickless Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation / Post Award Motion for Interest and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on arrears of weekly compensation from 3 December 1984
- 2 Whether delay in prosecution disentitles the applicant from interest
- 3 Calculation of interest on net arrears after offsetting Social Security payments
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is entitled to interest on the net sum of $40,083.72, representing the difference between compensation entitled and Social Security payments received, from 3 December 1984 to 17 June 1998 at 6% per annum. The delay by the applicant was sufficiently explained and does not disentitle him from interest.
Court Disposition
Interest awarded to applicant; respondent to pay costs.
Orders
- Respondent to pay interest on $40,083.72 at 6% per annum from 3 December 1984 to 17 June 1998.
- Respondent to pay applicant's costs of the notice of motion filed 15 February 2001.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment