Plath v Glover [2010] NSWLEC 119
The defendant’s conduct was premeditated, intentional, and reckless as to legality, committed for profit, causing low environmental harm. The offence’s objective gravity was low, but prior convictions and continued attitude of disobedience warrant specific deterrence. The appropriate penalty, after mitigation for early guilty plea, is conviction, a fine of $7,500, and prosecutor’s costs of $9,000.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Gordon Plath; Defendant: Kevin Francis Glover
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Offences, Sentencing Procedure, Damaging Reserved Land, Collection of Native Seeds, Prior Convictions, Remorse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon Plath
Prosecutor
Kevin Francis Glover
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is guilty of damaging native vegetation contrary to s 156A(1)(b) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
- 2 Assessment of objective and subjective gravity of the offence for sentencing
- 3 Appropriate sentence for damaging reserved land including picking seed cones and damaging native vegetation
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant’s conduct was premeditated, intentional, and reckless as to legality, committed for profit, causing low environmental harm. The offence’s objective gravity was low, but prior convictions and continued attitude of disobedience warrant specific deterrence. The appropriate penalty, after mitigation for early guilty plea, is conviction, a fine of $7,500, and prosecutor’s costs of $9,000.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence imposed
Orders
- The defendant is convicted of the offence as charged.
- The defendant is fined the sum of $7,500.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment