Edwards v The Queen [1992] HCA 19
The misdirection in failing to instruct the jury that intention to cause detriment was an element of the offence and that the appellant must have known of that purpose resulted in a miscarriage of justice, depriving the appellant of a real chance of acquittal; conviction quashed and new trial ordered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Court of Criminal Appeal (wa)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['director’s Duties' 'improper Use of Position' 'criminal Participation' 'objective/subjective Knowledge' 'misdirection of Jury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Court of Criminal Appeal (wa)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s. 229(4) of Companies (Western Australia) Code requires proof of purposive intention to cause detriment' "Whether knowledge of all essential elements, including impropriety, is required for 'knowingly concerned' liability" 'Whether jury was properly directed as to elements of offence under s. 229(4) and s. 38(1)' 'Application of criminal appeal proviso in the context of errant jury direction']
Ratio Decidendi
The misdirection in failing to instruct the jury that intention to cause detriment was an element of the offence and that the appellant must have known of that purpose resulted in a miscarriage of justice, depriving the appellant of a real chance of acquittal; conviction quashed and new trial ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; new trial ordered.
Orders
- ['Order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of Western Australia set aside.' 'Appeal to that Court allowed.' 'Conviction quashed.' 'New trial ordered.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment