REGINA v. STEWART [1999] NSWCCA 119

REGINA v. STEWART [1999] NSWCCA 119

The appeal was dismissed because, making full allowance for the jury's advantage in assessing witnesses, it was reasonably open to the jury to reject evidence that the appellant was not "John-Boy" and to accept evidence identifying him as the person known as "John-Boy" who entered the premises. In light of the appellant's admissions about his nickname and associates, and the evidence of Mr Rayner and others, the Court was not in doubt and did not consider there was a significant possibility that an innocent person had been convicted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 May 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['aggravated Break and Enter' 'unsafe and Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'identification Evidence' 'role of Jury']
['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure'] ['aggravated Break and Enter' 'unsafe and Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'identification Evidence' 'role of Jury']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the jury verdicts were unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence.' 'Whether the identification evidence was such that the jury ought to have had a reasonable doubt about the appellant being the offender known as "John-Boy".']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because, making full allowance for the jury's advantage in assessing witnesses, it was reasonably open to the jury to reject evidence that the appellant was not "John-Boy" and to accept evidence identifying him as the person known as "John-Boy" who entered the premises. In light of the appellant's admissions about his nickname and associates, and the evidence of Mr Rayner and others, the Court was not in doubt and did not consider there was a significant possibility that an innocent person had been convicted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.']