Olson v Keefe (No 5) [2023] FCA 127
Given the applicant is not presently ordinarily resident in Australia and lacks sufficient assets in Australia to satisfy any adverse costs order, and in the absence of demonstrated prejudice from delay or proximity to hearing, the discretion is exercised to order security for costs in favour of the respondents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs / Determination of Security for Costs Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. Order for security for costs made.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'practice and Procedure' 'delay' 'jurisdiction' 'enforcement of Judgments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs / Determination of Security for Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should the applicant be ordered to provide security for costs for the respondents?' "Does the applicant's non-residence and insufficient assets in Australia justify an order for security for costs?" 'Does the delay or proximity to hearing affect the discretion to order security for costs?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the applicant is not presently ordinarily resident in Australia and lacks sufficient assets in Australia to satisfy any adverse costs order, and in the absence of demonstrated prejudice from delay or proximity to hearing, the discretion is exercised to order security for costs in favour of the respondents.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Order for security for costs made.
Orders
- ["The applicant to provide security for respondents' costs in the amount of AUD200,000 by irrevocable bank guarantee or payment into Court by 17 March 2023." 'If not complied with, the proceeding is stayed until security is provided, parties to notify the Associate, respondents may restore the matter before the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment