Shirlaw v Graham [2001] NSWSC 612
The court may use s 447A of the Corporations Law to validate or remedy a technical defect in the directors' resolution appointing an administrator, including where the resolution did not expressly state the directors' opinion of insolvency, as the power is plenary and aims to fulfil the legislative purpose of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kevin Richard Shirlaw; First Defendant: Colin Keith Graham; Second Defendant: Stephen Michael Larkin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Final Hearing / Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made validating administration.
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Companies, Validity of Resolution, Court Power to Validate Appointments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Richard Shirlaw
Plaintiff
Colin Keith Graham
First Defendant
Stephen Michael Larkin
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Final Hearing / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of an administrator was valid where the directors' resolution did not strictly comply with s 436A(1) of the Corporations Law
- 2 Whether the court can remedy or validate the appointment under s 447A or s 1322 of the Corporations Law
Ratio Decidendi
The court may use s 447A of the Corporations Law to validate or remedy a technical defect in the directors' resolution appointing an administrator, including where the resolution did not expressly state the directors' opinion of insolvency, as the power is plenary and aims to fulfil the legislative purpose of enabling effective administration for the public benefit.
Court Disposition
Orders made validating administration.
Orders
- Pursuant to s 447A of the Corporations Law, as from 29 June 2001 Actwane Pty Limited has been validly under administration and Mr Kevin Richard Shirlaw has been the administrator.
- Same order made with respect to Actwane Hotel Management Pty Limited substituting the date 4 July 2001.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment